13 January 2012

Climate Change Mitigation from Pyrolysis

Posted in News, Biochar, Science

Abstract
In the report 2001 by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projects that climate could warm by as much as 10º F over the next 100 years and we already observed a warming of about 1º F since 1900. Therefore, how to mitigate the greenhouse gas effect is a very important issue since it affects everyone alive and not born.
This paper mainly discusses the impacts of greenhouse gas emission that affects people the most. This paper mainly discusses the following questions:
1) what factors lead to the greenhouse gas effect?
2) How can pyrolysis become a potential source to mitigate the greenhouse gas effect and what are the choices we may have?
Pyrolysis, as another bioenergy alternative, helps climate change mitigation while it also produces biochar that fixes carbon as a more stable form that has additional value when applied in agricultural land. GHGs come from the use of fossil fuel (CO2), nitrogen fertilizer application (N2O), and livestock enteric fermentation (NH4) and we need to find some strategies to reduce the emissions of GHGs such as crop fertilization alteration, crop tillage alteration, livestock management, manure management and biofuel production.

Since CO2 play the most important role in the GHG effects, the goal of this paper is to find the alternative energy to help mitigate the GHG effects by reducing the amount of CO2 emissions. The forest can be a candidate because it has the function of carbon sink and is able to produce energy biomass. Forests really do a good job that reduce the amount of CO2 in the air, however, since the carbon value and interest rate will affect the optimal rotation length, it becomes uncertain whether or not the forest will be able to provide a stable input for energy production.
Source Climate Change Mitigatin from Pyrolysis

Comments (3)

  • Suwanchanee

    Suwanchanee

    08 April 2012 at 15:42 |
    To my mind the biggest roeasn that this situation is occurring is the illogical rejection of nuclear by the Greens and the Left in general. While they rant on about climate change, the only solutions they seem to believe in are in essence hairshirt acts of contrition. It seems its not enough to stop damaging the planet, no we have to mortify the flesh by shifting to lifestyle that will require more effort and produce more inconvenience to atone for the sins of materialism and past comforts.Unfortunately this seems to have invoked subconscious latent guilt in those parts of Judeo-Christian ethic that Western nations have not yet been able to shake. Somehow at some level, no mater how much they would not like to live this way, many still believe at some level, it is more right to do so than to live as we do now.That is not to say that things like conservation or recycling are stupid. but at the same time we all don't have to go back to living like horse and buggy Mennonites, which is the message that is the unspoken undercurrent of the message of the Green/Left.In my opinion this group has confounded the issue to the point where the average voter is torn between what he is being told is moral and ethical, and what he wants for himself and his loved ones in his heart. The result is the inaction that we see on the topic, as now no decision will mean not making the wrong one.
  • Anthony

    Anthony

    08 April 2012 at 11:35 |
    The government are sennidg mixed messages; pulling the low carbon building programme (for commercial buildings), yet launching the new code 6 for sustainable homes (domestic buildings) at Ecobuild on 4th March 2009.
  • Sista

    Sista

    07 April 2012 at 21:25 |
    I'm just starting out make some home-made bio-char in by back yard- xmeeriepntal type stuff just for my own garden. Was wondering the species of wood that work best?I have an abundance of Willow, Ash and Spruce

Leave a comment

You are commenting as guest. Optional login below.